Possibility to change Y offset of Layers in TileMap?

[regnared]

When I change the Y offset of a certain layer, the second the game runs the Y offset is reset to 0. Is there an option to turn this off? (only for that particular layer)

The reason I am using y offset, is so I can use a single tile for small objects that will be placed on the bookshelves but also use it to place it on the floor.

Example:

[unikronsoftware]

Hmm.. interesting. Never thought of this use case.
It is easy enough to patch in though -
in tk2dTileMapBuilderUtil.cs, look for this line:
               layer.gameObject.transform.localPosition = new Vector3(0, 0, accumulatedLayerZ);

and then change the y there for layerId == 1.

[regnared]

Thank you for the code.

I went up with using :

Code: [Select]

                    layer.gameObject.name = tileMap.data.Layers[layerId].name;
                    if (layer.gameObject.name != "top objects")
                        layer.gameObject.transform.localPosition = new Vector3(0, 0, accumulatedLayerZ);
                    else
                        layer.gameObject.transform.localPosition = new Vector3(0, 12, accumulatedLayerZ);
Since I have 3 layers for the level, they would of all been offset by 12 pixels.

Would it be possible to acquire the X and Y local values of the layers position and use them in? I have seen in the code that there is a Z value ( tileMap.data.Layers[layerId].z ), X and Y would be mighty useful if ever someone has many layers. This way I would not have to hardcode any values in and the code would be kept to one line, clean and beautiful. 

Code: [Select]

         layer.gameObject.transform.localPosition = new Vector3(tileMap.data.Layers[layerId].x, tileMap.data.Layers[layerId].y, accumulatedLayerZ);
This way the layers would always stay put, where they are needed. I tried browsing in the code for a way to acquire the data, I guess for now it would have to be with prefabs or going the hardcoded way?

[unikronsoftware]

It won't be in the next update, as this is slightly more involved for a generic solution, but I'll look into it for the following update.

[regnared]

Oh wow. Thanks a lot for that.